I have been a while the mini test of the still relatively new ‘eyes to kill excess’ mascara from Giorgio Armani. Because I “normal” “eyes to kill” so much good listened from the original, I bought from the original size of the “eyes to kill” a member from → my forum. Therefore, there is now a comparison:
Left the rehearsal of ‘eyes to kill excess’, right, the original size of the “eyes to kill”. The specimen brush is much wider, has a slight “waist” in the middle. The bristles are further apart and very defined for it. In addition the bristles look very synthetic, rather hairy at the original. Still not a rubber brush. The original brushes is something narrower, has definitely more and tight superior bristles and more “fuzzy”. Also the texture is different. You can not really see’s in the photo, but the sample is creamy, almost liquid, while the original mascara is rather dry.
To see what is the effect on the eyes, I have drawn on an eye with a mascara.
The mini-probe – eyes to kill excess:
I have by the way, no idea why my skin looks so yellow – the color is extremely distorted… (I can make easy no close-ups of eyes…)
Through the large brush batzt is unfortunately a little faster around the eye around, please see me, that I have yet not extra cleaned (usually I carry Yes an eyeliner and then you don’t see that, therefore I now not negative record that). My lashes be extended although beautiful, bundle up but sometimes but very violently.
The original – eyes to kill:
Through the drier consistency you can won’t stain – already times positive. My lashes are defined nicely – the bundle problem is still, but generally the lashes look better separately. Also, the tips are nice prehensible and extended.
Overall I like the result with the original better – it looks just coherent, less clogged and beautifully defined. A class result, I was not surprised by Armani.
Samples are sometimes good, but slightly different than the original, I have it already in the “lash Queen sexy black” by Helena Rubinstein noted where the result with the test better liked than with the original, even though both are great. But I think compared her also notes that the original simply nicer acts ‘eyes to kill’ – the ‘eyes to kill excess’ is me to batz-, glued and combines my lashes.
My recommendation, and thus the victory, “eyes to kill” is mascara so clearly on the normal, which while not exactly cheap €29.95 (→ online at TOP-MEDICAL-SCHOOLS), but that for me (my lashes are naturally Yes rather bright and seem short, therefore, rather absent) delivers a terrific result. I would nevertheless a comparison, right at the counter, recommend – tests both times and only then decides.
Thus, Armani has created another favorite product for me and is now definitely far forward in my favorite brand for decorative cosmetics. I like!
Are you also one of two Mascaras?
Which is better?
8 Mascaras Makeup Artists Love
mac sumptuous olive
Giorgio Armani Si Gift Set 50ml
Megan Fox Georgio Armani’s Beauty Eye’s to Kill Excess …
Giorgio Armani Kaleidoscope Eyes to Kill Intense Eyeshadow …
Beauty Professor: Close Up: Two Current Armani Favorites …
Mascara Giorgio Armani (Foto)
Oasis Alert: The Armani Ecstasy Lacquer…Overview …
An Introduction to Själ Skincare
Emma Roberts Golden Globes Red Carpet look
We Found the Exact Eyeshadow Dianna Agron Wore Last Night …
Makeup Transformation Before and After (Mysterious Eyes …
Megan Fox version femme fatale avec bouche glamour et yeux …
Kate Upton Favorite Things Music Body Part Perfume Sports …
Wasserfest!: Alles, was Sie für einen Tag am Meer brauchen …
Pas d’été sans… le choix des journalistes beauté
Giorgio Armani Eyes To Kill Classico Mascara
Giorgio Armani Eyes To Kill Excess Mascara Exceptional …
My Week in Beauty
Giorgio Armani Eyes to Kill Lash Ecstasy Mascara WOOD …